Solution
Same plant truth. Lender-grade.
Operating evidence built to land on the desk of a credit committee, an IE, or an investor portfolio review. LumeTrax® aggregates plant operating data — performance, availability, classified downtime, loss attribution — into reports that don't require three weeks and four spreadsheets to assemble.
Independent platform. No OEM allegiance, no EPC counterparty stake, no IPP customer-acquisition incentive. Data neutrality is contractual, not aspirational.
Five questions every credit committee, IE, and investor portfolio review eventually asks.
| Question | What's needed to answer it |
|---|---|
| Is the asset meeting PPA performance? | Energy delivered vs. PPA-contracted, weather-normalized PR vs. expected PR, period-over-period comparability |
| Where did the missing megawatt-hours go? | Loss attribution decomposed per cause (soiling, shading, clipping, curtailment, downtime, weather) — auditable to source |
| Was downtime PPA-attributable or counterparty-attributable? | Classified downtime per attribution category (PPA-recoverable / OEM warranty / O&M / weather / grid / curtailment) with evidence pack |
| Is the DSCR sustainable? | DSCR-relevant operating metrics aggregated to the level the debt was written at, source-linked, exportable |
| What's the technical opinion on disputed performance? | Independent technical review (Audit & Assurance) with measured / calculated / assumed / judged source classification |
The standard fix for these questions is to commission an Independent Engineer for each one, then reconcile their analyses. The other fix is to put the source data on a platform that produces all five answers from one record — and let the IE work from that source rather than from email exports.
Five questions. Three modules. One source.
| Module | What it contributes to lender evidence |
|---|---|
| LumeTrax Vision — Performance Analytics | Weather-normalized PR, capacity-weighted availability, loss attribution per cause, source-linked figures, methodology page documented |
| LumeTrax Asset Manager — O&M Workflow | Classified downtime per attribution category, work-order trail per event, warranty-claim evidence pack, SLA compliance reporting |
| LumeTrax Audit & Assurance — Independent Service | Bankability-grade technical reviews with source-classified outputs (measured / calculated / assumed / judged), conflict-screened engagements |
Vision answers the recurring quarterly questions. Asset Manager produces the classified-downtime evidence the contract was written against. Audit & Assurance is engaged when an independent voice is required — pre-COD readiness, post-COD verification, OEM claim review, periodic lender / investor reporting.
When performance is disputed, evidence matters.
Audit & Assurance runs on the same operating data the platform produces — but as an independent engagement, conflict-screened, with source-classified deliverables. Reports distinguish measured data, calculated outputs, assumptions, and reviewer judgement. Disagreements between counterparties typically resolve at the assumption-or-judgement layer, where they belong.
| Engagement | When you'd use it |
|---|---|
| Pre-COD readiness review | Before commercial operation date, confirming asset is ready for the contract regime it was financed against |
| Post-COD performance verification | End of first 12 months or periodic cadence, against weather-normalized expectations and contract definitions |
| OEM claim review | When a warranty, performance-guarantee, or LD claim is in dispute |
| Lender / investor reporting | Periodic standardised pack — same format every period |
The version a lender opens.
Anonymised sample reports — real methodology, synthetic numbers, no real customer name — available below.
Vision quarterly performance report
Weather-normalized PR, availability, loss attribution waterfall, plant ranking, methodology footnote.
Download →PDF SAMPLEAudit & Assurance bankability review
Source-classified executive summary, full methodology, reconciliation against OEM-reported figures, counterparty allocation.
Download →PDF SAMPLECustomer security pack
Architecture, OT/IT separation, identity, data residency, sub-processors, certification status, data-neutrality policy.
Download →Aggregated to the level the debt was written at
Operating metrics that survive the credit committee.
- Energy delivered vs. PPA-contracted, period-over-period
- Weather-normalized Performance Ratio with documented methodology
- Capacity-weighted availability decomposed by attribution category
- Specific yield (kWh/kWp) and capacity factor against design expectations
- Degradation-adjusted yield trajectory
- Recoverable vs. permanent loss per period
- OPEX per MWp, year-over-year
- Counterparty allocation (PPA-recoverable, OEM warranty, O&M, weather, grid)
All source-linked. Every figure traces back to the historian record, alarm event, or work-order ID it came from. Methodology page delivered with every engagement and updated when the methodology changes.
Evidence packs assembled per PPA window — not per support ticket.
PPA compliance reporting compiles automatically from completed work orders, classified downtime events, and historian snapshots. Period-end packs cover energy delivered, PR vs. expected, availability decomposition, force-majeure invocation evidence, curtailment events with grid-operator timestamps, and any contractual-tolerance breach with attribution and recovery status.
When a PPA dispute lands on counsel's desk, the evidence pack already exists — the engagement is reading and presenting it, not assembling it.
Where the regulatory regime asks for evidence — the platform produces it.
Grid-operator reporting (forecasted vs. actual delivery, ancillary-service participation, frequency-response activations) and ESG reporting (avoided emissions, asset-level operational carbon footprint, biodiversity-impact monitoring where instrumented) compile from the same operating-data source as the financial-grade reports. The cadence and format are agreed at engagement; the evidence is auditable to source.
Concrete commitments, not soft governance
Customer data belongs to the customer. Committed in the website and in the contract.
The seven commitments below are published policy on this page. They also appear verbatim in the customer DPA / MSA — they're contractual, not aspirational. Independence isn't a marketing claim; it's a documented policy that customers (and their lenders, on behalf of customers) can audit and require in writing.
The seven commitments.
- 01Customer data belongs to the customer.
- 02Tenant data is segregated by architecture.
- 03LumeTrax does not share plant-level data with OEMs, EPCs, O&M contractors, lenders, or affiliates unless explicitly authorised by the customer in writing.
- 04Cross-portfolio benchmarking is opt-in and anonymised.
- 05Commercial teams do not access customer operating data except for contracted support, audit, or advisory scope.
- 06LumeTrax does not resell or license customer operating data to any third party.
- 07Where LumeTrax software is installed, Audit & Assurance reports distinguish measured data, calculated outputs, assumptions, and reviewer judgment — sources are not blended.